From Duke Cheston at the Pope Center for Higher Education Policy comes a discussion of a new federal policy that seriously weakens protections for college students accused of sexual assault. This is ominous for those falsely accused.
In April 2011, the Obama administration’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) sent a “Dear Colleague” letter to colleges, universities, and schools across the country to explain newly created federal rules on dealing with sexual violence. A major change was to lower the burden of proof for colleges to punish students for sexual assault, which ranges from attempted forced kissing up to and including rape.
These new rules were touted as a way of promoting “enhanced equity.” But, in reality, the new rules rather inequitably reduce the protections of those who are accused (mostly males).
The new rules ostensibly come from a reinterpretation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the law that prohibits colleges that receive federal funds from discriminating based on gender—best known for requiring women’s sports to be treated equally to men’s. Arguing that sexual assault is a form of gender discrimination, the office decreed a handful of new regulations.
The most aggressive new interpretation was a mandate that colleges and universities lower the burden of proof when deciding cases of assault. The bar was dropped to the lowest possible standard, a “preponderance of evidence.” In other words, a college disciplinary committee merely needs to decide that an accused individual is more likely to have committed a crime than not. Those deciding the case must be only 50.1 percent sure of guilt. That standard is lower than the one used in criminal cases, which is “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and generally thought of in numeric terms as 98 percent sure.
........As you post your comment, please conform to Right Angles's simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. If you wouldn't say it to a co-worker in front of your boss, it probably is not civil and respectful. We will delete any comment that fails this test and issue a warning to the poster. A second offense will result in a ban on commenting on this site. In sum, disagreements, arguments even, are welcome; abusive behavior is not. Thanks.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
24
2012 At 8:19 pm, geek49203 Said:
Wabash College = all male
Hampden-Sydney College = all male
Yes, I am a grad of one of those. No, I’m not gay. And both have strong academic and athletic reputations.
24
2012 At 8:26 pm, geek49203 Said:
Please tell me why we are sending 18-year-olds off to a residential college these days? Why are we spending, in some cases, $50k per student per year for degrees that have no economic contribution once they are awarded?
This issue (of sexual harassment charged and some sort of due process on campus) is one of hundreds of major issues in the current system, which seems to be poised on the edge of collapse.
24
2012 At 8:31 pm, geek49203 Said:
Morehouse… that’s the third all-male college remaining. Forgot about Morehouse.
But those are the 3 remaining all-male colleges.