More than half of America seems to think that “rich” people don’t need their money so, hey, let’s just take it from them. If higher taxes on the “rich” becomes the country’s solution to deficit and debt, then what will that tax-the-rich-more policy actually do for us?
|
........As you post your comment, please conform to Right Angles's simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. If you wouldn't say it to a co-worker in front of your boss, it probably is not civil and respectful. We will delete any comment that fails this test and issue a warning to the poster. A second offense will result in a ban on commenting on this site. In sum, disagreements, arguments even, are welcome; abusive behavior is not. Thanks.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
01
2012 At 9:39 pm, mike978 Said:
True, did anyone say the increased taxes on the rich and yes $250,000 (more like $300000 after deductions) is rich when the median income is more like $30K, would cover the entire deficit.
Spending cuts are needed and some have already happened (frozen federal salaries for 5 years or does that not count?) More are needed and the sequester does a $1T cut.
01
2012 At 9:40 pm, mike978 Said:
Can you remind me how much of the debt was paid back during 201-2006 when the economy was growing and the GOP had complete control of the Presidency, House and Senate. The answer would be zero.